| Cycle Course | Absorbance | Quantity of NA used | Quantity of NA recovered |
Round 1 | Cycle 9 | 19.729 | 400pmol | 1728.1 ng/µL |
Round 2 | Cycle 9 | 13.314 | 400pmol | 1232.7 ng/µL |
Round 3 | Cycle 12 | 20.174 | 400pmol | 1807.4 ng/µL |
PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
Several problems were encountered, most of which were due to human error. During round 2 the initial cycle course PCR amplified significantly later than the first round. This can be seen above in the first cycle course for round 2. This was most likely due to a problem encountered during the reverse transcription.All of the first set of components were added to reverse transcription reaction. However after the RNA denaturing step, when the Super Script II was about to be added, it became apparent there was only 1 µl remaining. The 1µl was added to the E1 reaction, while the W0 and W3 were left on ice for approximately 40 minutes before being able to react in the thermocycler. The 3.8% agarose gel illustrated amplification at cycle 20, 11 cycles later than the previous round. Although stringency was changed from round 1 to round 2, the difference was too significant. The round was restarted and yielded expected results.
FUTURE WORK
The purpose of this study was to select RNA against CXCL-1, in pursuit of creating a suitable aptamer through selection. Up until this point, only three rounds of selection have been completed, but have gone as per protocol. Conclusive results cannot be determined until more rounds of selection are performed. A binding assay will be the next step, once a sufficient amount of rounds of selection have been performed. This will determine how well the RNA has bound to this specific target.
No comments:
Post a Comment